I'm not a fan of puppy play but early on in my journey into the BDSM lifestyle the idea was introduced to me and the foreign idea of puppy restraints were described. It took a while before I actually saw them and although they were pretty much exactly like the mental picture I had of them, I was still a bit fascinated by them in a couple of different ways.
For those who aren't familiar with puppy restraints, there's two primary devices that generally encompass puppy play. The first are the actual puppy restraints. These consist of a leather strap that wraps around the cock and balls. On the strap are a one or two O-rings. There are also a pair of wrist and ankle cuffs. Each pair of cuffs is connected by a chain and the chain is threaded through an O-ring on the cock and ball strap. The general purpose of the restraints is to keep the sub on his knees, unable to extend his arms or legs. He can crawl but if he extends one arm (or leg), the other arm (or leg) is pulled closer to his balls.
Basically, he can't stand up, nor use more than one arm at a time.
The other common bondage devices of puppy play are fist mitts. Fist mitts are a pair of leather bondage mittens that buckle around the wrist hold the wearer's hands in a closed position and restrict the thumb from being used. The idea being that the wearer's hands become useless and uncoordinated, limiting any attempt at ordinary hand usage.
It took a bit of thought for me to discover just what drew me in so strongly to these items even when I have no desire for puppy play. I soon realized that it was the original descriptions I had heard long before seeing them and the symbolic association they held that had my mind racing so out of control. I'm sure some readers will say I am over-analyzing this but that's just how my mind works :)
With puppy restraints (aside from just using them for puppy play), it's the idea that to use one limb, you must give up the other limb. Freedom can't be taken granted. Attempted motion beyond what you are allowed will cause pain or discomfort to your genitals. I've found this to be consistent with my views on the sacrifices one makes in submission. Any gains are met with equal or greater loss. In turn, the Domme can continuously inflict suffering and a physical manifestation of the give/take nature by simply placing her sub in the restraints for a period of time.
Fist mitts hold allure on a different level (in a way that isn't puppy play). Why would a Domme put a sub in fist mitts? Because she can. His life just became infinitely more difficult trying to do anything and your hands just basically became stumps. A fun idea if you enjoy cruelty.
I've learned from experiences that I prefer strict limits to the push and pull of the sliding chain. I've had situations similar to the puppy restraints as well as motion limited with a chain run through a collar, belt, etc. where extending one hand pulls the other hand back. I'm not sure why exactly but if faced with these options I tend to prefer bondage that involves second one:
-A 12" chain run through a ring, each end connected to one wrist restraint.
-Each wrist connected to a ring by a 6" chain.
It's hard to tell from the photo, but it doesn't appear that the wrist or ankle cuffs are locking types. That might make the mitts more practical, in that you wouldn't be able to use your hands to untie said cuffs.
ReplyDeleteOther than for that purpose, the mitts seem rather silly looking. However, I do like the O ring and sliding chain concept. I'd just use locking cuffs and avoid the mitts, if for no other reason than the aesthetic.
I don't think those ones are locking but I agree they would be better suited if they were locking. I think they assume anyone using those restraints will probably also be using fist mitts...
ReplyDeleteOverall the mitts aren't that practical except for killing time, e.g. spraying a deck of cards all over a hardwood floor and having the sub pick them all up while wearing them.