One of the biggest
fundamental differences in the way that people view a BDSM-oriented
kink lifestyle is related to how encompassing the dynamics fall into
every day life. Basically, does power exchange occur only during
defined periods or is it on all the time?
For some, D/s is
roleplay engaged in between consenting individuals for set periods of
time with the goal of mutual pleasure.
For some, D/s is a
way of life that governs nearly every aspect of daily life.
There are also some
hybrid forms where most of the "action" occurs at defined
times but there may be some daily responsibilities required of one
party or the other.
I tend to avoid
passing judgement over the flavors that people prefer. The world is
far too miserable of a place to look down upon anything that makes a
couple happy. If someone just wants steamy hot sex, I see nothing
wrong with that. If someone wants a personal servant doting upon
their every whim, I see nothing wrong with that.
I will go ahead and
create my own terms here: full time for those who practice
D/s as an "always on" lifestyle, and part time for
those with dynamics that are not always on.
I will note that I
believe the vast majority of those who partake in D/s would classify
themselves as part time. I believe full time is the minority even
though they may be represented disproportionately high in the
blogosphere.
A lot of the full
time vs. part time reasoning depends heavily upon the preferences of
the dominant. They bear the brunt of the responsibility for keeping
the dynamics going, so it makes sense that the extent of the dynamics
should fall in line with how much they are wanting to monitor things.
As far as submissive desires go, I think there is often a wide rift
between what they fantasize about and what they can actually handle.
With that in mind, it is easy for subs to desire full time but then
struggle when facing it as a reality. A good number of them can
retain a rational balance by knowing to “be careful what you wish
for.”
Having lived out
both styles, I have to say that I crave full time beyond anything.
The reality of it is terrifying. As much as you can build up trust
it is still a leap of faith to present yourself with total
vulnerability. I believe this is what separates roleplay from
lifestyle. In roleplay you may act powerless or at the mercy of
another. It is controlled. There is a start, a stop, and you will
be “back to normal” upon its completion. This in itself is a
fine choice. It is a safe choice. It is a reasonable and
responsible choice.
It is scary as hell
to adapt to a new way of living, a new way of thinking, and a new set
of ever-evolving expectations while having little power to control
what will happen. There are limits, of course, but anything that
falls short of those limits is fair game. I think this type of
vulnerability scares a lot of people even in vanilla relationships.
To allow the one we love to see us without guards, without walls, and
without masks is terrifying. They see our good and our bad, our
strengths and our weaknesses. However, I have to say that when they
see you all the way to your core and still choose to embrace you, you
really have found that truly special bond that can’t be built in
any other way.
I enjoyed this posting, fur. I saw myself in the following statement:
ReplyDelete"There are also some hybrid forms where most of the "action" occurs at defined times but there may be some daily responsibilities required of one party or the other." However, I would change the words "may be" to "definitely are" in my case. There's really never a time that at least some part of the D/s dynamic isn't in play. It's just a matter of degree, and the total immersion (i.e. slavery) aspect is hard to imagine as sustainable over a 24/7, 365 days a year time frame. Do you really feel that you could deal with that? Have you ever found a Mistress who could? That would be far too much of a burden, even for me.
Thank you, Lady Grey.
DeleteI am a big fan of the idea of some D/s always in play.
As for if I could deal with that... I believe that if thrust into such a situation and broken by cruelty that I would be able to adapt to it. Whether I would remain intact at all as a person and/or be happy and thrive within it is a different question entirely.
I have come across bloggers and the like who allude to doing that but I don't think I have ever met a woman that seemed like she was "on" all the time. People have their moods and their desires and needs shift around them. I believe many women might have a side of themselves that carries that aura, but finding a woman where that is the ONLY side they have would be rare.
The closest I have come across is in fiction where a character has been raised since birth to rule as an aristocrat/noble/etc. and has been taught to always think about others as beneath them. For people in today's society this is rather unlikely.
Take care.