Dominance, I believe is perfectly rational. You know what you want, you pursue what you want, you enact rules and protocols to ensure you get what you want. This absolutely makes all of the sense in the world to me. I mean, really, if you were a dominant, you could order your sub to perform as a service top, and have it carried out in an idealized fantasy way.
By submitting in lifestyle D/s, you disempower yourself. You lose options. You lose the freedom to make certain choices. You lose the ability to control much of what happens. It is no longer up to you. So the reasoning goes, if you have an idea of what you want and how you would like things to be, giving up the control over whether or not life resembles that idea is irrational.
Unless… your desire is to have no power… and that idealized life you think about is the absence of choices and freedom. In this case, it is closer to rational.
However, I know many many subs that have a strong preference for the “do me” type of activities over service activities and they do not wish to give up the power to have those things happen. In these types of cases, the choice does in fact seem irrational.
I know that some may counter this idea with “it gets me off” or “it doesn’t get me off,” but that becomes more a matter of sexuality
As "BIG SISTER" might say (apologies to George Orwell) "disempowerment = freedom". It just depends on your point of view, right? Of course, we're talking about D/s here, not types of government. I'm sure that should be clear, right fur?
ReplyDeleteThank you, Lady Grey. This gave me quite a chuckle :)
Delete